The main trade agreements concluded under the WTO are: The Agriculture Agreement (AOA), the EXCHANGE agreement (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights), the agreement on the application of health and plant health measures (SPS), the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement (CTO), the Trade-Related Investment Measures Agreement (TRIMS), the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) Etc. While GATT focused on trade in goods, the WTO and its agreements could encompass not only goods, but also trade in services and other intellectual property rights such as commercial creations, designs and inventions. This agreement is no longer enforced. It was only valid until 2004. It had essentially set quotas for the amount of textile and clothing exports from developing countries to industrialized countries. Developed countries, including the United States and the EU, have done so to protect their own local producers. The dismantling of this agreement has given developing countries such as India a great chance. To take advantage of this opportunity, India should be prepared to meet the requirements of foreign customers in terms of standardization, modernization, adaptation and profitability. The hope for a global trade agreement under the WTO has therefore collapsed. The TFA was proposed to come into force on July 31, 2015, but it was not completed. As was pointed out at the beginning, India is not against the TFA.
Modi`s new government had another concern with another agreement. This was due to some “disagreements” over the next agreement that withdrew India. Our problem was food security, that is, the ministerial decision on public storage for food security purposes. India and the WTO are an important topic for public service review, particularly for UPSC Mains. In 2013, there was a question for the network: “The Food Security Act should eliminate hunger and malnutrition in India. Critical discussions on the various fears about their effective implementation and the concerns it has raised in the WTO. It is therefore clear that a law passed by the Indian parliament has raised concerns within the WTO. The issues that bind India to the WTO have not yet been resolved. The current controversy concerns India`s refusal to sign a crucial trade agreement: the Trade Facilitation Agreement.
These notified TRIMs were to be withdrawn by December 31, 1999. None of these measures are currently in effect. As a result, India has no outstanding commitments with respect to TRIMs notified under the TRIMs agreement. Pending the conclusion of the Uruguay Round negotiations, which resulted in a well-concluded agreement on trade-related investment measures (the TRIM agreement), the few international agreements providing for disciplines for foreign investment withholding measures have provided only limited guidance on content and countries. The OECD Code on the Liberalization of Capital Movements, for example, requires members to liberalize restrictions on direct investment in a number of areas. However, the effectiveness of the OECD code is limited by the many reservations of each member.  This agreement prohibits the host country from discriminating against foreign investment in relation to domestic investment, i.e. the agreement requires that investment be freely authorized by nations. Given that the WTO is based on consensus, it is extremely difficult to reach agreement on reforms among the 164 members. One possible opportunity to move forward would be to reach a multilateral agreement with a like-minded group of countries on a new regulatory framework that would complement the broader WTO.